RUS 

REVIEWER  MEMO

     
JOURNAL  OF  NEW  MEDICAL  TECHNOLOGIES,  eJournal
 
 
    In reviews is given: a comprehensive and objective assessment of the content and structure of the article, the analysis of strengths and weaknesses of the article (short message, a case from the practice, review of literature, lectures), an evaluation of the scientific level of presentation material.
    In the final part of the review is to be justified conclusions regarding the advisability of publishing the materials in the journal "Herald of new medical technologies". In case of a negative opinion of the reviewer, the conclusions of the latter should be sufficiently reasoned and clearly formulated in the final part of the report. The review should be signed by the author with indication of the place of work of the reviewer of his position, academic titles and degrees. The signature is to be certified by the seal and date.
    Generic requirements: Compliance with the rules of registration of articles adopted in the journal "Herald of new medical technologies". (Rules are edited by reviewer in printed form and electronically).
    Content requirements:
    ▪ Self-sufficiency. The article should contain basic information on the topic.
    ▪ Obviousness. The text may be accompanied by illustrations, facilitate the perception of the material, but not repeating it.
    Data quality requirements:
    ▪ According to the latest achievements of science and clinical practice.
    ▪ Accuracy, reliability and validity of the data cited.
    ▪ Use of the principles of evidence-based medicine, standardization of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
    ▪ Use of the latest classifications and nomenclatures: ICD-10, the international system of units (SU), and other.
    ▪Compliance names of Medicines State register of Medicines; the first should be mentioned international nonproprietary name, then frequently used in Russia trade names.
    Presentation style requirements.
    ▪ Headings. The structure of the text is set in advance - from the name of the article, through headings and subheadings to individual proposal. This text has to be easy to use and to find.
    ▪ Consistency, coherence and simplicity of the presentation, without unnecessary details.
    ▪ Clarity of definitions, accessibility for the reader's understanding of the relevant courses.
    ▪ Unambiguous use of terms, consistent designation of one term of homogeneous objects and phenomena.
    ▪ Compliance with the norms of modern Russian language. Deleted: many introductory words, explanations are not on the merits of the article, the excessive number of abbreviations.
    ▪ Allocation of key positions on the text in bold or in italics.
    Note: Discussion papers, in addition to wearing antisocial character, after reviewing accepted for publication, accompanied by a special editorial opinion. Short communications and case studies are evaluated from 10 points under the heading of «Requirements to quality information».
Requirements governing the publication quality Assessment of the implementation of the requirements in points (1 to 10) Notes
Generic requirements::
1. Conformity of the specialty.
10  
Contents requirements:
2. Self-sufficiency.
3. Obviousness.
10  
Data quality requirements:
4. According to the latest achievements of science and clinical practice.
5. Accuracy, reliability and validity of the data cited.
6. Using the principles of evidence-based medicine, standardization of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
7. Use of the latest classifications and nomenclatures.
8. The naming of the medicines State register of medicines.
9. Methodical level of presentation of educational material, its adaptability to educational technology (referred to lectures and methodical development).
10  
Presentation style requirements:
10. Dividing according to subject headings.
11. The consistency, coherence and simplicity of the presentation, without unnecessary details.
12. The clarity and accessibility of definitions.
13. The uniqueness of the use of terms.
14. Observance of the norms of modern Russian language.
15. Allocation of key positions on the text in bold or in italics.
10  
Visual style requirements: 10  
TOTAL points: 50  
    Note: The maximum number of points - 50 (if there are no comments).
    CONCLUSION: Comment to the account of the author comments. The problem (part of the journal):
    Section I. Biology of complex systems. Mathematical biology and bioinformatics in medical and biological systems.
    Section II. Clinic and treatment methods. Functional and instrumental diagnostics. New medicinal forms.
    Section III. Medical Biophysics and development of medical diagnostic equipment.
    Section IV. Medical education. Coordination of scientific research. Economic and legal issues in medicine.
    Section V. Discussion section. Letters to the editor. The reviews.
    Section VI. History and philosophy of science, history of medicine, science of science, topical issues of ethics of science and bioethics.
    Section VII. Editorial portfolio (underline).
    Class article: original research results, new technologies, methods of diagnostics, treatment, preventive measures; basic research; clinical and experimental research; scientific review; discussion; history of medicine; exchange of experience; observation of practice; practical recommendations; review; lecture; a brief message; anniversary; informational messages, solutions of congresses, conferences, plenums (underline).
    Expediency (inexpediency) of publication of the article.
Position, scientific degree The academic rank of the expert, Office address and telephone       «____»_________20__     ___signature___Full name of expert
 
 
REVIEWER FORM OF REPORT SUBMISSION
(filling sample)
Initial data: Article «New principles of treatment of arterial hypertension». Ivanov Ivan Ivanovich, doctor of medical science, Professor, Voronezh state medical Academy, Professor of the Department of internal diseases.
Requirements governing the publication quality Assessment of the implementation of the requirements in points (1 to 10) Notes
Generic requirements:
1. Conformity of the specialty.
10  
Contents requirements:
2. Self-sufficiency.
3. Obviousness.
8 1. The excess of tabular material.
2. The quality of the figures is unsatisfactory.
Data quality requirements:
4. According to the latest achievements of science and clinical practice.
5. Accuracy, reliability and validity of the data cited.
6. Using the principles of evidence-based medicine, standardization of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
7. Use of the latest classifications and nomenclatures.
8. The naming of the medicines State register of medicines.
9. Methodical level of presentation of educational material, its adaptability to educational technology (referred to lectures and methodical development).
8 1. Used inadequate method of mathematical evaluation of results.
2. There were inconsistencies names of medicines to the State Registrar.
Presentation style requirements:
10. Dividing according to subject headings.
11. The consistency, coherence and simplicity of the presentation, without unnecessary details.
12. The clarity and accessibility of definitions.
13. The uniqueness of the use of terms.
14. Observance of the norms of modern Russian language.
15. Allocation of key positions on the text in bold or in italics.
9 1. A lot of introductory words and unnecessary repetitions.
Visual style requirements: 9 1. Used font and fonts that are not recommended for use.
TOTAL points: 44  
    Note: The maximum number of points - 50 (if there are no comments).
    CONCLUSION: Comment to the account of the author comments. The problem (part of the journal):
    Section I. Biology of complex systems. Mathematical biology and bioinformatics in medical and biological systems.
    Section II. Clinic and treatment methods. Functional and instrumental diagnostics. New medicinal forms.
    Section III. Medical Biophysics and development of medical diagnostic equipment.
    Section IV. Medical education. Coordination of scientific research. Economic and legal issues in medicine.
    Section V. Discussion section. Letters to the editor. The reviews.
    Section VI. History and philosophy of science, history of medicine, science of science, topical issues of ethics of science and bioethics.
    Section VII. Editorial portfolio (underline).
    Class article: original research results, new technologies, methods of diagnostics, treatment, preventive measures; basic research; clinical and experimental research; scientific review; discussion; history of medicine; exchange of experience; observation of practice; practical recommendations; review; lecture; a brief message; anniversary; informational messages, solutions of congresses, conferences, plenums (underline).
    Expediency (inexpediency) of publication of the article.
Head of Internal Medicine Department,
 
Doctor of Medical Science, Professor
300001, Voronezh, Entuziastov street, 14
(code) 35-21-21                                         «____»_________20__ ______Petrov P.P.
 ;
 
Last  update  02.04.2014